You can find an incredibly rich set of resources here that includes articles, curriculum materials, videos, Blogs from industry experts, online discussion forums, Job Postings, Training Listings, the most detailed listing of outdoor adventure providers on the Web and more! Thanks for being a part of the Outdoor Ed Community
Outdoor Ed Store
Outdoor Ed Community
The Recreation Law Center
The Outdoor Ed Community is the online Social Networking site for outdoor professionals where you can interact colleagues and peers from around the world.
Outdoor Ed offers the best source for outdoor professionals to find careers and for employers to find great staff. We also host the largest online directory of companies and schools offering outdoor and experiential education programs and degrees. You can search for specific jobs, companies or schools.
From Wilderness First Aid courses to rock climbing certifications, this is your source for finding professional training.
The Outdoor Ed Community is where you can interact with other outdoor professionals.
sat through a wilderness medicine class by a well-meaning instructor who, despite decent
credentials, had never cared for anyone in the wilderness. This is just after reading a
poorly crafted wilderness medicine text. Instead of listening to the talk I made a list of things that drive me nuts in wilderness medicine education.
At the top of the list is classroom
medicine. These are tools,
techniques and advice that work in a clean, controlled world and fail in the
reality of the field. Years ago we
taught, I taught, not to apply warmth to a severely hypothermic patient because
they were in "a stable metabolic icebox." Then I knelt next to my first severely hypothermic
patient and the shallowness of this advice was clear. I had no illusions I would warm this patient in the field,
but not applying heat to stabilize his temperature made no sense. I read advice to keep frozen feet
frozen all night by keeping the foot outside a sleeping bag. This fell to the axe of reality when I
stared at my own frozen foot in a tent on a cold winter's night. We used to think tourniquets implied
amputation and that open chest wounds need to be sealed with three-sided
dressings to allow air to escape.
This classroom advice did not survive the test of the battlefield. If your skepticism meter is pegging
over words of dubious wisdom, ask the instructor if he has ever done this to a
real patient. You'll be surprised
how often the honest answer is no.
High on my list are inaccurate
statements of frequency. If I believed all the
tales of drama I hear from someone who heard from someone who heard, I would
not leave home without an auto- injector of epinephrine in a hip holster,
locked and loaded. If I
believed the NOLS incident data history, solid enough to generate multiple
medical papers, I can argue that anaphylaxis is rare in the wilderness. But I won't make that argument. A snapshot is not the entire
picture. Data is often a matter of
context. We don't know the true incidence of anaphylaxis, or many other ailments,
in the outdoors. Statements of frequency need to be viewed with healthy skepticism.
In the same vein I recently read that the
risk of a lawsuit from reducing a dislocation in the field is high. Based on what cases or data? I've heard outdoor experts say that the
most common injury on NOLS courses is a laceration from slicing cheese. The real answer, sprains and strains,
is easily accessible in the published literature. When you see or hear numbers, ask for the source, and ask
for the conflicting evidence. If
the educator is worth his salt he will tell you the breadth of
science on this question and why he choose to believe this particular
study. Consider any unreferenced
number to be junk.
I'm also skeptical of resumes, credentials
and endorsements. Resumes can be
exercises in creative writing, exaggerating or underselling experience. Credentials often tell us of educational
accomplishments, not experience.
Endorsements might be earned, but they can also be purchased-- a source
of income for an organization willing to sell their name. These badges don't tell us whether the
person has ever seen a patient, seen a patient in the wilderness, spent much
time in the wilderness or whether they have ever had to make a real decision in
In my upper echelon of molar grinders are statements of absolutes. These
often reveal inexperience, not expertise, and as William Osler MD said
"are made at the expense of a clean conscience." There isn't an “accepted” splint. There are splints that are crafted
based on available resources and splinting principles. There is no single evacuation
plan. There is only what we create
based on sound plans, sound assessments and sound judgments. There are many lists of classic signs
and symptoms, there is rarely a classic patient.
Last, but not least, is the phrase "our
curriculum is evidence-based." This is an intriguing statement since quality evidence in
first aid is rare, and in wilderness first aid it is almost non-existent. I prefer to say
acknowledges that our choices are a blend of science, experience and
Am I a curmudgeon? Probably. Am I
innocent of these sins? Probably
not. But I am aware. I'm trying to be virtuous and I do have
the good fortune of being surrounded by colleagues who enjoy calling me to task when I
NOLS Wilderness Medicine Institute
Connect & Share